data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cd9e/9cd9e3474881d807d524526e6437441ef046ed7e" alt=""
Saturday, January 28, 2006
Ninjas in 2 dimensions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cd9e/9cd9e3474881d807d524526e6437441ef046ed7e" alt=""
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
We, the Self-Proclaimed Artists, in order to form a better union, have formed the "Self-Proclaimed Artists Union," a place to post all types of art and comment on it. Short stories, poetry, photography, drawings, and anything else, even pottery.
2 comments:
Yes, but it makes you look at it longer, trying to figure out how to make it make sense to you. Giving the viewer an invitation to examine it in different ways is an element that makes for great art and brings out different things depending on the viewer.
For example, you probably assumed, before viewing it, that it was left-to-right, it didn't make sense, and knowing me, thought to look at it from right-to-left because of our manga influences.
Sorry, but I have to agree with Wil, it's not Magna style, which is readable because it was made by people who read from right-to-left, so it's structured in a way that only takes half a second to adjust to. However, YOU think right-to-left, and no matter what techniques you use, doing a comic in the reverse of your thought style is going to produce something confusing and disorienting that detracts from the storyline. The comic itself is not bad. In order to get it I had to load it up in photoshop and inverse the pictures. Even then, some panels were off, but not to hard to move around.
Basicallly, if you absolutly want to imitate manga, then you should draw it naturally in the way that your brain works and the inverse it after you scan it.
My recommendation would be to just do it western style.
Post a Comment